Hi, sorry it was a bit poorly defined. I'm talking about thinks like this: http://lwn.net/Articles/551179/ Stefan Am 25.05.2014 11:11, schrieb Andrey Korolyov: > Hi, > > which one you are talking about? -rt patchset has absolutely no > difference for Ceph, though very specific workload (which I was unable > to imagine at a time) can benefit of it a little. Windriver variant > means much more, because it rt`ing virtualized envs - in combination > with storage nodes you may achieve a lot better deadlines for tasks > like gaming servers and so on, but I had not tried it. > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > <s.priebe at profihost.ag> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> has anybody ever tried to use a low latency kernel for ceph? Does it make any differences? >> >> Greets, >> Stefan >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |