For what it's worth, version 0.79 has different headers, and the awk command needs $19 instead of $20. But here is the output I have on a small cluster that I recently rebuilt: $ ceph pg dump all | grep active | awk '{ print $19}' | sort -k1 | uniq -c dumped all in format plain 1 2014-05-15 2 2014-05-17 19 2014-05-18 193 2014-05-19 105 2014-05-20 I have set noscrub and nodeep-scrub, as well as noout and nodown off and on while I performed various maintenance, but that hasn't (apparently) impeded the regular schedule. With what frequency are you setting the nodeep-scrub flag? -Aaron On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Mike Dawson <mike.dawson at cloudapt.com>wrote: > Today I noticed that deep-scrub is consistently missing some of my > Placement Groups, leaving me with the following distribution of PGs and the > last day they were successfully deep-scrubbed. > > # ceph pg dump all | grep active | awk '{ print $20}' | sort -k1 | uniq -c > 5 2013-11-06 > 221 2013-11-20 > 1 2014-02-17 > 25 2014-02-19 > 60 2014-02-20 > 4 2014-03-06 > 3 2014-04-03 > 6 2014-04-04 > 6 2014-04-05 > 13 2014-04-06 > 4 2014-04-08 > 3 2014-04-10 > 2 2014-04-11 > 50 2014-04-12 > 28 2014-04-13 > 14 2014-04-14 > 3 2014-04-15 > 78 2014-04-16 > 44 2014-04-17 > 8 2014-04-18 > 1 2014-04-20 > 16 2014-05-02 > 69 2014-05-04 > 140 2014-05-05 > 569 2014-05-06 > 9231 2014-05-07 > 103 2014-05-08 > 514 2014-05-09 > 1593 2014-05-10 > 393 2014-05-16 > 2563 2014-05-17 > 1283 2014-05-18 > 1640 2014-05-19 > 1979 2014-05-20 > > I have been running the default "osd deep scrub interval" of once per > week, but have disabled deep-scrub on several occasions in an attempt to > avoid the associated degraded cluster performance I have written about > before. > > To get the PGs longest in need of a deep-scrub started, I set the > nodeep-scrub flag, and wrote a script to manually kick off deep-scrub > according to age. It is processing as expected. > > Do you consider this a feature request or a bug? Perhaps the code that > schedules PGs to deep-scrub could be improved to prioritize PGs that have > needed a deep-scrub the longest. > > Thanks, > Mike Dawson > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20140520/2ee7e812/attachment.htm>