On Fri, 16 May 2014 13:51:09 +0100 Simon Ironside wrote: > On 13/05/14 13:23, Christian Balzer wrote: > >>> Alas a DC3500 240GB SSD will perform well enough at half the price of > >>> the DC3700 and give me enough breathing room at about 80GB/day > >>> writes, so this is what I will order in the end. > >> Did you consider DC3700 100G with similar price? > > > > The 3500 is already potentially slower than the actual HDDs when doing > > sequential writes, the 100GB 3700 most definitely so. > > Hi, > > Any thoughts or experience of the Kingston E50 100GB SSD? > > The 310TB endurance, power-loss protection and 550/530MBps sequential > read/write rates seems to be quite suitable for journalling. > Thanks for bringing that to my attention. It looks very good until one gets to the Sandforce controller in the specs. As in, if you're OK with occasional massive spikes in latency, go for it (same for the Intel 530). If you prefer consistent perfomance, avoid. Christian > Cheers, > Simon > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer chibi at gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications http://www.gol.com/
 |