On 13/05/14 13:23, Christian Balzer wrote: >>> Alas a DC3500 240GB SSD will perform well enough at half the price of >>> the DC3700 and give me enough breathing room at about 80GB/day writes, >>> so this is what I will order in the end. >> Did you consider DC3700 100G with similar price? > > The 3500 is already potentially slower than the actual HDDs when doing > sequential writes, the 100GB 3700 most definitely so. Hi, Any thoughts or experience of the Kingston E50 100GB SSD? The 310TB endurance, power-loss protection and 550/530MBps sequential read/write rates seems to be quite suitable for journalling. Cheers, Simon
 |