Re: [Ceph-maintainers] Debian wheezy qemu rbd support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm pasting this in here piecemeal, due to a misconfiguration of the list.  I'm posting this back to the original thread in the hopes of the conversation being continued.  I apologize in advance for the poor formatting below.


On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Schlacta, Christ <aarcane@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks for letting me know. I'll have to forward the entire discussion to the list, unless you object. I'll do it when I get home

On Jan 27, 2014 12:38 PM, "Gaudenz Steinlin" <gaudenz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi

"Schlacta, Christ" <aarcane@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> So what about getting a ceph enabled qemu (and recently discovered:
> libvirt) added to the ceph extras repository?

Don't know. I'm in now way involved with the repositories on ceph.com.
BTW you only sent your mail to me privately and not to the lists.

Gaudenz

> On Jan 27, 2014 2:13 AM, "Gaudenz Steinlin" <gaudenz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Schlacta, Christ wrote:
>> >> So on Debian wheezy, qemu is built without ceph/rbd support. I don't
>> know
>> >> about everyone else, but I use backported qemu. Does anyone provide a
>> >> trusted, or official, build of qemu from Debian backports that supports
>> >> ceph/rbd?
>> >
>> > Not that I know of.
>> >
>> > CCing the Debian maintainers; it would be nice to get this enabled in the
>> > Debian packaging.
>>
>> RBD support is currently disabled in qemu in Debian. There is a bug
>> report (#729961)[1] asking for it to be enabled. Once this is done and a
>> ceph
>> backports is also available in Debian backports, a qemu backport with
>> rbd enabled can be done. As qemu is regularly backported I would expect
>> this to happen pretty soon after the preconditions are met.
>>
>> The major blocker at the moment is that the version of ceph in Debian
>> testing is still 0.48-2. The main reason for this is that ceph is part
>> of several library transitions going on at the moment.
>>
>> A recent ceph version needs to go into testing first as a precondition
>> for an official backport (to avoid upgrade issues when the next stable
>> version of Debian is released). And this is apparently also a
>> precondition for the qemu maintainers to enable rbd support.
>>
>> Gaudenz
>>
>> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729961
>> >
>> > sage
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ceph-maintainers mailing list
>> > Ceph-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-maintainers-ceph.com
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
>> Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
>> ~ Samuel Beckett ~
>>

--
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
~ Samuel Beckett ~

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux