It's also good to note that the m500 has built in RAIN protection (basically, diagonal parity at the nand level). Should be very good for journal consistency.
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse brevity and typographical errors.
On Jan 15, 2014 9:07 AM, "Stefan Priebe" <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 15.01.2014 15:03, schrieb Robert van Leeuwen:
Power-Loss Protection: In the rare event that power fails while the
drive is operating, power-loss protection helps ensure that data isn’t
corrupted.
Seems that not all power protected SSDs are created equal:
http://lkcl.net/reports/ssd_analysis.html
The m500 is not tested but the m4 is.
Up to now it seems that only Intel seems to have done his homework.
In general they *seem* to be the most reliable SSD provider.
Testing the m4 is useless as it as no power loss protection. The result should have been known before the test has started.
But yes intel is very reliable but the 520 series and others from intel aren't.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
