On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/21/2013 02:50 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Abhijeet Nakhwa >> <abhijeet.nakhwa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Ceph FS is really cool and exciting! It makes a lot of sense for us to >>> leverage it. >>> >>> Is there any established goal / timelines for using Ceph FS for >>> production >>> use? Are specific individual support contracts available if Ceph FS is to >>> be >>> used in production? >>> >> >> I don't know when inktank will claim Cephfs is stable. But as a cephfs >> developer, I already have trouble to find new issue in my test setup. >> If you are willing to help improve cephfs, please try cephfs and >> report any issue you encounter. >> > > Great to hear. Are you also testing Multi-MDS or just one Active/Standby? > I test both. For multiple mds setup (using the newest development tree), basic fs functions are close to stable. but still need more time to tune the performance. > And snapshots? Those were giving some problems as well. > snapshot is the most incomplete feature of cephfs. So far I completely ignore issues in this area. > >> Regards >> Yan, Zheng >> >> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > > > -- > Wido den Hollander > 42on B.V. > > Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902 > Skype: contact42on > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |