We rely on the stability of rhel/centos as well. We have no patch/upgrade policy or regulatory directive to do so. Our servers are set and forget. We circle back for patch/upgrades only for break/fix.
I tried F19 just for the fun of it. We ended up with conflicts trying to run qemu-kvm with ceph. I could get one or the other working but not both. Our architecture is calling for compute and storage to live on the same host to save in hardware costs.
I also tried to recompile libvirt and qemu-kvm today. I didn't even see rbd libraries in the source code.
/C
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/06/2013 04:28 PM, Alek Paunov wrote:
> On 07.12.2013 00:11, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>> 6 months lifecycle and having to os-upgrade your entire data center 3Not where I work they aren't.
>> times a year?
>>
>> (OK maybe it's "18 months" and "once every 9 months")
>
> Most servers novadays are re-provisioned even more often,
Yes, that is the main argument for tracking ubuntu. ;)
> Fedora release comes with more and more KVM/Libvirt features and
> resolved issues, so the net effect is positive anyway.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
