It actually depends on what your accesses look like; they have different strengths and weaknesses. In general they perform about the same, though. -Greg Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Any performance penalty forma both solutions? > > Il giorno 07/mag/2013 19:40, "Gregory Farnum" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > >> To access CephFS you need to either use the kernel client or a >> userspace client. The userspace CephFS client is called ceph-fuse; if >> you want to use the kernel's built-in access then obviously you need >> it on your machine... >> -Greg >> Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com >> >> >> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta >> <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > 2013/5/7 Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> As long as you're planning to use ceph-fuse for your filesystem access, >> >> you >> >> don't need anything in the kernel. >> > >> > I will not use ceph-fuse but plain ceph-fs when production ready. >> > Ceph-fs should not need kernel module, like ? _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |