Re: Inconsistent PG with 1 inconsistent object not referenced in the log

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Can we see a pg query of 0.190 ?

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Ana Aviles <ana@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a cluster that was running hammer (0.94.10). We hit a bug where
> right after seemingly fixing an inconsistent PG, the primary OSD would
> crash and restart. Next deep-scrub will again return inconsistent PG.
>
> We filled in a bug issue
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/24652#change-115654 that was closed
> since it was a known bug fixed in newer versions of Ceph.
>
> Now the cluster is running jewel (10.2.11). There is again one
> inconsistent PG with 1 error which not able to fix and with no
> reference to the inconsistent object.
>
>
> scrub 0 missing, 1 inconsistent objects
> scrub 1 errors
>
>
> We have the logs with debug level 20 while repairing the PG. The one for
> the primary OSD is: 94e20123-fcda-49d7-98a2-919507dfbc92
>
> Thanks!
> Kind regards,
>
>
> --
> Ana Avilés
> Greenhost - sustainable hosting & digital security
> E: ana@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> T: +31 20 4890444
> W: https://greenhost.nl
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Cheers,
Brad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux