I believe we have established that the exact doc license is unknown at this
time, since COPYING does not specify a version. Would it be enough to declare
in the mailing lists that the doc license version is declared to be, e.g., 3.0
of CC-BY-SA and that if anyone disagrees they should speak up? (With the
understanding that, if they do, their stuff will be removed/rewritten.)
Then it would be a simple matter of fixing the relevant lines in COPYING and
the packaging.
I think a pull request making the change (with a summary of the history)
and a message to this list soliciting comments is sufficient to resolve
the ambiguity.
Comments are hereby solicited on pull request
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/20876
Thanks,
Nathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
