Do we do 2d round of QE validation ? On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Abhishek wrote: >> On 2017-09-25 11:43, Abhishek wrote: >> > On 2017-09-25 03:08, Yan, Zheng wrote: >> > > On 2017/9/24 22:03, Abhishek wrote: >> > > > On 2017-09-19 23:11, Patrick Donnelly wrote: >> > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > kcephfs - needs analysis - Patrick, Zheng FYI >> > > > > >> > > > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21463 >> > > > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21462 >> > > > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21466 >> > > > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21467 >> > > > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21468 >> > > > > >> > > > > Last 3 look like blockers. Zheng will have more input. >> > > > >> > > > Here are the results of a rerun with -k testing, >> > > > http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-22_19:35:04-kcephfs-luminous-testing-basic-smithi/ >> > > > & details http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21296#note-20 >> > > > There are a few failures which look environmental but a few look like >> > > > they are related to the changeset (the ones with cache) >> > > > >> > > "MDS cache is too large" issue should be fixed by >> > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17922 >> > Ah alright this is a qa suite fix, we can run a the suite with a qa >> > suite argument just to be sure. >> >> alternatively we can just merge this in luminous branch and this gets tested >> in the final qe run anyway, since we may have to do that since there are some >> rados and cephfs changes? > > Yes, let's do that. > > I think all of the other blockers are resolved now? > > sage > > >> > >> Are there any other cephfs patches that needs to go in to the luminous >> > brancha as such? I believe we would want the qe suites after the RADOS >> > PR went in (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17796) >> > Sage, Josh, Yehuda, Patrick >> > Is there anything else that needs to go in before we start a second round? >> > >> > >> > >> > > Regards >> > > Yan, Zheng >> > > >> > > > Best, >> > > > Abhishek >> > >> > -- >> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
