On 2017-09-25 11:43, Abhishek wrote:
On 2017-09-25 03:08, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On 2017/9/24 22:03, Abhishek wrote:
On 2017-09-19 23:11, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Yuri Weinstein
<yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
kcephfs - needs analysis - Patrick, Zheng FYI
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21463
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21462
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21466
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21467
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21468
Last 3 look like blockers. Zheng will have more input.
Here are the results of a rerun with -k testing,
http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-22_19:35:04-kcephfs-luminous-testing-basic-smithi/
& details http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21296#note-20
There are a few failures which look environmental but a few look like
they are related to the changeset (the ones with cache)
"MDS cache is too large" issue should be fixed by
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17922
Ah alright this is a qa suite fix, we can run a the suite with a qa
suite argument just to be sure.
alternatively we can just merge this in luminous branch and this gets
tested in the final qe run anyway, since we may have to do that since
there are some rados and cephfs changes?
Are there any other cephfs patches that needs to go in to the luminous
brancha as such? I believe we would want the qe suites after the RADOS
PR went in (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17796)
Sage, Josh, Yehuda, Patrick
Is there anything else that needs to go in before we start a second
round?
Regards
Yan, Zheng
Best,
Abhishek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
