On 2017-09-25 03:08, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On 2017/9/24 22:03, Abhishek wrote:
On 2017-09-19 23:11, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
kcephfs - needs analysis - Patrick, Zheng FYI
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21463
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21462
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21466
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21467
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21468
Last 3 look like blockers. Zheng will have more input.
Here are the results of a rerun with -k testing,
http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-22_19:35:04-kcephfs-luminous-testing-basic-smithi/
& details http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21296#note-20
There are a few failures which look environmental but a few look like
they are related to the changeset (the ones with cache)
"MDS cache is too large" issue should be fixed by
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17922
Ah alright this is a qa suite fix, we can run a the suite with a qa
suite argument just to be sure.
Are there any other cephfs patches that needs to go in to the luminous
brancha as such? I believe we would want the qe suites after the RADOS
PR went in (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17796)
Sage, Josh, Yehuda, Patrick
Is there anything else that needs to go in before we start a second
round?
Regards
Yan, Zheng
Best,
Abhishek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
