On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:53 AM, John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The thing is, our boost could easily end up being the "old" one, if > the distro is shipping security updates to theirs. Our > higher-numbered boost packages would potentially block the distro's > updates to their lower-numbered boost packages. If we ship our own > separate boost, then maybe Ceph is stuck with an un-patched boost, but > other applications on the system are not. That scenario is theoretically possible, and it's good that you bring it up for consideration. I'm trying to understand the likelihood of the effort/disruption there. Do you have specific applications in mind that would benefit in the way you describe? Ones that require boost and are often co-installed on Ceph nodes? - Ken -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
