On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Jesse Williamson wrote:
> > Also... wouldn't sizeof("foo")-1 work just as well as string_length()?
>
> constexpr char *s[] = { 'f', 'o', 'o', '\0', '\0' };
>
> ...seems like it would still be a problem using sizeof(). (But, runtime
> strlen() and a constexpr string_length() would still return the same
> result.)
But nobody does that. It's stuff like
strlen("\r\nffffffffffffffff;chunk-signature=")
which can just be
sizeof("whatever") - 1
and it is clear to the reader of the code that it isn't strlen and \0's in
the string aren't relevant.
IOW I don't see why we would need a fully C-like constexpr strlen...
sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
