On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Adam C. Emerson wrote:
> On 14/06/2017, Jesse Williamson wrote:
> > This will no longer be constexpr.
>
> Alternatively we could just have it return n-1 in that case, though
> that risks letting things that we /expect/ to be C strings that won't
> interoperate with C sneak through.
It seems like that ambiguity would be explicitly communicated by using the
originally proposed string_length() instead of a clever
strlen()-lookalike.
Also... wouldn't sizeof("foo")-1 work just as well as string_length()?
sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
