Re: Are we ready for 10.2.8 - cephfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just curious, why do we add that label?  I've always filtered this by
using "base:jewel" in github.

Well, when we are trying to get backports merged for the "next" point release while the "current" one is in QE, we open PRs targeting jewel-next - so that's not ironclad.

But I don't really know the answer to why the milestone tag is there. It's what we've always populated the integration branch by. I agree it's not optimal because PRs can get delayed waiting for someone to set the milestone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux