On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Nathan, if we have time to do another pre-merge test run for jewel >> backports, then there are a few with label:cephfs and my review on, >> that would just need to go through a fs suite. > > > OK, I think we can manage that. Please note that it's the milestone:jewel > tag in the PR that determines whether the PR gets picked up for integration > testing. If the milestone is not set, the script doesn't see it. (I will > look into patching the script so it makes noise if it sees a PR targeting > the jewel branch but without a milestone, or with the wrong milestone.) Just curious, why do we add that label? I've always filtered this by using "base:jewel" in github. John > Nathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
