Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If someone reports problems upgrading their firefly cluster to hammer, and
the problem is in firefly, will we publish a new firefly release?

If someone reports problems upgrading their dumpling cluster to firefly, and
the problem is in dumpling, will we publish a new dumpling release?

Probably not. But, we do know that upgrades work now and so any new
failures must be a failure of the new version of Hammer. That, we
would hopefully avoid releasing, and would definitely issue a fix
release for. :) We can't strand users!

Several people have looked at the upgrade/firefly-x (hammer) failures and nobody has found anything that wasn't an issue with the tests themselves. Maybe you could take a look, too?

http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2017-01-30_20:52:09-upgrade:firefly-x-hammer-distro-basic-vps/

Note that this QE run was done against the old gitbuilder build system.
Yuri has some special technique for achieving that ;-)

This is because the old builds that are needed to run the tests were/are missing in the new build system. Injecting the old gitbuilder builds into the new system is apparently possible, but a manual hit-or-miss process. See http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18089

(David Galloway has been _very_ helpful there, but the issues persist.)

This issue is affecting the jewel rados suite, even, since that suite includes a couple tests that install various dumpling and firefly releases and then upgrade them.

Thanks,
Nathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux