Let's ignore samba here too. The rgw failures are all valgrind... can Matt or Yehuda take a look and make sure they're not new/problematic? Thanks! sage On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Tamilarasi Muthamizhan wrote: > Yuri, lets skip firefly-x upgrade issue. > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) PASSED now! > > Outstanding suites requiring approval: > > rgw > samba > upgrade/firefly-x (hammer) > > Sage? > > Thx > YuriW > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Yuri Weinstein > <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > See updated status with approvals > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-61 > > > > Outstanding suites requiring approval: > > > > rgw > > samba > > upgrade/firefly-x (hammer) > > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) > > > > Thx > > YuriW > > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Nathan Cutler > <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Turned out to be a buggy test -- hammer is missing an > infernalis > >>> commit f217865cf7c4 ("test_librbd_fsx: invalidate before > discard in > >>> krbd mode"). > >> > >> > >> I gave it a try; please take a look: > >> > >> * https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13230 > >> > >> Nathan > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > >
