Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From re-reading this thread I determined that the only two outstanding issues are upgrade/firefly-x and rgw+centos (can anyone confirm?)

I don't think upgrade/firefly-x should be a blocker. Rationale: as of the jewel release, firefly clusters were supposed to be upgraded to at least hammer. As of the kraken release, support of hammer has been focused on facilitating users to upgrade from hammer to jewel. In other words, firefly clusters should already have been upgraded and upgrading from firefly to hammer is no longer supported.

As for the rgw valgrind/libtcmalloc failures on centos, I made a wip-hammer-baseline branch based on "hammer" but with a different SHA1 ("git commit --amend --reset-author") and pushed it to ceph/ceph-ci.git so Shaman will re-build it. This should ensure that "flavor=notcmalloc" really means what it says. Re-running rgw+centos on this wip-hammer-baseline branch will tell us more.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux