Abhishek L writes: > Sage Weil writes: > >> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Abhishek L wrote: >>> Abhishek L writes: >>> >>> > Sage Weil writes: >>> > >>> >> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Abhishek L wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Abhishek L writes: >>> >>> >>> >>> > Sage Weil writes: >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Abhishek L wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Sage, Greg, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Yuri Weinstein writes: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > See updated status - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-32 >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> > Outstanding issues: >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> > knfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397 (same as in v10.2.3, Greg >>> >>> >>> > pls review/approve, assumed Approved ?) >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 ((Sage >>> >>> >>> > pls review/approve, seems persistent, but maybe not a showstopper) >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> > upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated (Nathan is still working >>> >>> >>> > to make it pass, see issues in the tacker summary above) >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> > Sage, jewel 10.2.4 can be released as soon as you agree with the >>> >>> >>> > findings/summary. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Do you think we're ready to release 10.2.4 yet? >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I'm reproducing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 with logs to make >>> >>> >> sure this isn't a regression. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> We can ignore the infernalis runs. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I think we can ignore the knfs selinux issue too.. Greg, can you confirm? >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > Added the prs 12001 & 12167 on top of the jewel branch and scheduled rados runs >>> >>> > at >>> >>> > http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-11-29_10:22:25-rados-wip-jewel-10-2-4-distro-basic-smithi/ & >>> >> >>> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/1292 >>> >> >>> >> avoids xenial for the rados upgrade tests (in jewel branch). >>> >>> Ah alright, maybe this was the cause after all, let's get this in (or >>> push a branch to ceph-qa-suite so that I can schedule against that) >> >> I added a patch for the client-upgrade tests to the same branch. You >> should be able to just schedule with --suite-branch jewel-avoid-xenial >> instead of --suite-branch jewel (for both rados and >> upgrade/client-upgrade). >> >> sage >> >> >>> >> >>> >> The upgrade tests already explicitly call out trusty, so they should be >>> >> fine. >>> >> >>> >>> > updated the tracker at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-17, >>> >>> > with details of the test. I'll update the progress once the suite goes >>> >>> > through >>> >>> >>> >>> Had around 11 tests fail from 296 scheduled, there were a couple of >>> >>> valgrind issues on ceph-mon (which were seen at earlier runs on jewel as >>> >>> well) and an s3test failure, rest of the issues were looking related to >>> >>> infrastructure as they were failing to get specific version numbers from >>> >>> gitbuilders. >>> >>> >>> >>> Reported this issue as: >>> >>> >>> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18089 >>> >>> >>> >>> subsequent re runs are still failing with similar errors. The details >>> >>> are updated at >>> >>> >>> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-37 >>> >>> >>> >>> The upgrade suite has also failed with similar errors. >>> >> >>> >> Which one? >>> > The upgrade/client-upgrade suite (I hope this is the right upgrade >>> > suite), the errors are the same failed to fetch package version errors >>> > seen for the rados suite, so not actual test run errors yet. >>> > >>> > http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-11-30_09:58:50-upgrade:client-upgrade-wip-jewel-10-2-4-distro-basic-smithi/ >>> > is the run >>> > > Update on the current status, > For prs 12001 & 12167: (sage/Sam) > > The upgrade passed with the exception of infernalis/jewel which failed > with RBD (test_librbd_api.sh) (jdillaman please approve) > > http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-12-02_09:45:37-upgrade:client-upgrade-wip-jewel-10-2-4-distro-basic-smithi/ > > the rados run (with the exception of the valgrind issue) are still > waiting for completion for 4 of the 296 jobs, this one suite always > seems to die when scheduled, this is the current url of the rados jobs > (still waiting) > http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-12-02_10:06:39-rados-wip-jewel-10-2-4-rc-distro-basic-smithi/ Loic was able to spot the error in this run (which was a regression introduced by f95ed3e, this was later fixed in https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/1297, so running this suite on the latest branch came out green, http://pulpito.front.sepia.ceph.com/abhi-2016-12-05_10:25:26-rados-wip-jewel-10-2-4-rc-distro-basic-smithi/ Which means 12167 is also good to go. > > > for pr 12207: (josh) > the rgw suite also saw the same valgrind issue > (http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-12-01_22:19:07-rgw-wip-jewel-10-2-4-rc-distro-basic-smithi/) > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12267, (mon cleanup) was merged on Sam's approval. > > prs 11884 & 12067 (Sam, Alfredo): > the ceph create-keys pr #11884 hasn't been merged yet into jewel, is > there any suite that must be run to validate this. Same applies for > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12067 (OSDMon: MOSDBoot ) 12067 was merged on Sam's approval as well. Which only leaves us with 11884. Best, Abhishek Lekshmanan SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
