Re: new naming convention for building repos and binaries from branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Oct 7, 2016, at 7:27 AM, Andrew Schoen <aschoen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> I think we need a "do not build" prefix and a "build this asap" prefix.
>> Maybe nobuild-* and asap-*?
>> 
> 
> Is the 'asap-*' want here because of the typical long wait on the gitbuilders?
> 
> The way we're configured now we can build 10 branches at a time, all
> of those branches building for 3 distros. I haven't seen a build take
> longer than an hour or so. It'd be easy to scale that up as well, but
> I don't see the queue ever being backed up at our current load.

Most of the builds will be building almost the same files, I hope you guys are
using build caching mechanisms such as ccache to accelerate the build time.

Nitin


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux