On 09/09/2016 20:19, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Ticket http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46 updated with dev > leads approvals (pls review) as following (suites marked with * still > need decision/fix): > > rados: > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ) > > rbd: > multiple issues (Approved by Jason) > > krbd: > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222 > (Approved by Ilya) > > * knfs > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192 > (Greg pls review/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release) > > * samba: > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184 > (Greg pls review/approve) > > upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506 > (Approved by Loic) > > upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel): > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176 > (Approved by Loic) > > * powercycle: > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177 > (Sage pls review/approve) > > * ceph-disk > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17114 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17100 > (Loic pls review/approve) I confirm that these problems are related to the test suite and not ceph-disk executable. Therefore they are not, in my opinion, blockers for the jewel release. Cheers > Thx > YuriW > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46 >> >> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation: >> >> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs) >> rbd >> rgw >> fs >> krbd >> kcephfs >> knfs >> rest >> hadoop >> samba >> ceph-deploy >> ceph-disk >> upgrade/client-upgrade >> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) >> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) >> powercycle >> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list) >> >> ============================== >> Issues requiring approval/decision: >> >> rados: >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ) >> >> rbd: >> multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46) >> >> krbd: >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223 >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221 >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222 >> (Jason pls rview/approve) >> >> knfs >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192 >> (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release) >> >> samba: >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184 >> (Greg pls rview/approve) >> >> upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506 >> (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve) >> >> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel): >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176 >> (Sam, David pls rview/approve) >> >> powercycle: >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177 >> (Sage pls rview/approve) >> >> Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you >> and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider >> validating a new point RC (sha1). >> >> Thx >> YuriW -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
