Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ticket http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46 updated with dev
leads approvals (pls review) as following (suites marked with * still
need decision/fix):

rados:
   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)

rbd:
   multiple issues (Approved by Jason)

krbd:
   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
   (Approved by Ilya)

* knfs
   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
   (Greg pls review/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)

* samba:
   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
   (Greg pls review/approve)

upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
   (Approved by Loic)

upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
   (Approved by Loic)

* powercycle:
   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
   (Sage  pls review/approve)

* ceph-disk
   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17114
   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17100
   (Loic  pls review/approve)

Thx
YuriW

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
>
> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>
> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
> rbd
> rgw
> fs
> krbd
> kcephfs
> knfs
> rest
> hadoop
> samba
> ceph-deploy
> ceph-disk
> upgrade/client-upgrade
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
> powercycle
> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>
> ==============================
> Issues requiring approval/decision:
>
> rados:
>    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
>
> rbd:
>    multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
>
> krbd:
>    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
>    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
>    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
>    (Jason pls rview/approve)
>
> knfs
>    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
>    (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
>
> samba:
>    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
>    (Greg pls rview/approve)
>
> upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
>    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
>    (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve)
>
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
>    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
>    (Sam, David  pls rview/approve)
>
> powercycle:
>    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
>    (Sage  pls rview/approve)
>
> Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you
> and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider
> validating a new point RC (sha1).
>
> Thx
> YuriW
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux