Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46 The following suites were in scope of this point release validation: rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs) rbd rgw fs krbd kcephfs knfs rest hadoop samba ceph-deploy ceph-disk upgrade/client-upgrade upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) powercycle (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list) ============================== Issues requiring approval/decision: rados: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ) rbd: multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46) krbd: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222 (Jason pls rview/approve) knfs http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192 (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release) samba: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184 (Greg pls rview/approve) upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506 (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve) upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel): http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176 (Sam, David pls rview/approve) powercycle: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177 (Sage pls rview/approve) Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider validating a new point RC (sha1). Thx YuriW -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
