Re: 0.94.8 QE validation - on-hold

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oh never mind, Nathan.
It's fixed in teuthology, so my question was invalid

Thx
YuriW

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Should we backport https://github.com/ceph/teuthology/pull/933 to
>> hammer 0.94.8 ?
>
>
> Hi Yuri:
>
> While teuthology may have hammer, jewel, etc. branches, these can be ignored
> - only the master branch is used AFAIK.
>
> In my account on teuthology.front, I have a clone of
> https://github.com/ceph/teuthology and inside that I have a virtualenv from
> which I run teuthology-suite. To get the latest teuthology fixes, I usually
> just nuke the entire clone and start from a fresh clone:
>
> git clone https://github.com/ceph/teuthology
> cd teuthology
> ./bootstrap
> virtualenv/bin/teuthology-suite . . .
>
> Nathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux