Re: 0.94.8 QE validation - on-hold

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nathan

Should we backport https://github.com/ceph/teuthology/pull/933 to
hammer 0.94.8 ?

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you all.
>
> I will resume testing.
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> At this stage, after looking at this in great depth today we have decided
>>> this
>>> is a problem, most likely in libunwind, and should be able to be safely
>>> ignored. There are suppression files to be found for this issue, or very
>>> similar issues, such as
>>>
>>> https://github.com/hkimura/foedus_code/blob/master/foedus-core/tools/valgrind.supp
>>> and we already even have multiple valgrind suppressions for similar
>>> issues.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ceph/teuthology/blob/master/teuthology/task/valgrind.supp#L38
>>>
>>> Thanks to Kefu for helping with this.
>>
>>
>> Thanks, guys. This showed up during integration testing and it was judged to
>> not be a blocker. We saw it on CentOS only.
>>
>> Nathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux