On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Wido den Hollander wrote: >>> > Op 11 juli 2016 om 9:32 schreef Piotr Dałek <branch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:57:12PM +0800, kefu chai wrote: >>> > > Hi Cephers, >>> > > >>> > > I am proposing drop the support of i386. as we don't compile Ceph with >>> > > any i386 gitbuilder now[1] and hence don't test the i386 builds on >>> > > sepia on a regular basis. Also, based on the assumption that people >>> > > don't use i386 in production, I think we can drop it from the minimum >>> > > hardware document[2]? >>> > > >>> > > And we won't explicitly disable the i386 build in code if we decide to >>> > > drop the i386 support, as we always try to be portable if possible. >>> > > But just don't claim the i386 as the officially supported arch >>> > > anymore. >>> > > >>> > > What do you think? >>> > >>> > +1 from my side. Regular users are on amd64, and those willing to run on >>> > small devices are using ARM anyway. >>> > >>> >>> Indeed. In my experience I have never seen a cluster run on i386. >>> >>> +1 from my side to drop i386. >> >> Yep. >> >> The only value is the i386 builder, which serves as a canary for 32-bit >> build issues, and is a more convenient that building on 32-bit arm >> hardware. So +.5 from me to keeping the builder around... > > We also don't build i386 releases anymore (at least for a couple of years now) thanks a lot, guys! i am posting a PR[1] removing i386 from the minimal hardware requirement doc. --- [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10276 -- Regards Kefu Chai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
