On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > Op 11 juli 2016 om 9:32 schreef Piotr Dałek <branch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:57:12PM +0800, kefu chai wrote: > > > Hi Cephers, > > > > > > I am proposing drop the support of i386. as we don't compile Ceph with > > > any i386 gitbuilder now[1] and hence don't test the i386 builds on > > > sepia on a regular basis. Also, based on the assumption that people > > > don't use i386 in production, I think we can drop it from the minimum > > > hardware document[2]? > > > > > > And we won't explicitly disable the i386 build in code if we decide to > > > drop the i386 support, as we always try to be portable if possible. > > > But just don't claim the i386 as the officially supported arch > > > anymore. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > +1 from my side. Regular users are on amd64, and those willing to run on > > small devices are using ARM anyway. > > > > Indeed. In my experience I have never seen a cluster run on i386. > > +1 from my side to drop i386. Yep. The only value is the i386 builder, which serves as a canary for 32-bit build issues, and is a more convenient that building on 32-bit arm hardware. So +.5 from me to keeping the builder around... sage
