On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> > Op 11 juli 2016 om 9:32 schreef Piotr Dałek <branch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:57:12PM +0800, kefu chai wrote: >> > > Hi Cephers, >> > > >> > > I am proposing drop the support of i386. as we don't compile Ceph with >> > > any i386 gitbuilder now[1] and hence don't test the i386 builds on >> > > sepia on a regular basis. Also, based on the assumption that people >> > > don't use i386 in production, I think we can drop it from the minimum >> > > hardware document[2]? >> > > >> > > And we won't explicitly disable the i386 build in code if we decide to >> > > drop the i386 support, as we always try to be portable if possible. >> > > But just don't claim the i386 as the officially supported arch >> > > anymore. >> > > >> > > What do you think? >> > >> > +1 from my side. Regular users are on amd64, and those willing to run on >> > small devices are using ARM anyway. >> > >> >> Indeed. In my experience I have never seen a cluster run on i386. >> >> +1 from my side to drop i386. > > Yep. > > The only value is the i386 builder, which serves as a canary for 32-bit > build issues, and is a more convenient that building on 32-bit arm > hardware. So +.5 from me to keeping the builder around... We also don't build i386 releases anymore (at least for a couple of years now) > > sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
