Re: civetweb upstream/downstream divergence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



IMHO the first step should be to get rid of the evil submodule. Arguably
the most direct path leading to this goal is to simply package up the
downstream civetweb (i.e. 1.6 plus all the downstream patches) for all
the supported distros. The resulting package would be Ceph-specific,
obviously, so it could be called "civetweb-ceph".

Like Ken says, the upstreaming effort can continue in parallel.

After we get Ceph/RGW working fine with civetweb-ceph 1.6, we can rebase
the package to upstream civetweb 1.7.

I am not volunteering to do all the work, but we at SUSE are certainly
prepared to shoulder our share of it.

-- 
Nathan Cutler
Software Engineer Distributed Storage
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.
Tel.: +420 284 084 037
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux