On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:58:07 -0700 Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We should definitely do it. We're based off civetweb 1.6, and there > was no official civetweb version for quite a while, but 1.7 was tagged > a few months ago. I made some effort and got most of our material > changes upstream, however, there are some changes that might need some > more work before we can get them merged, or might not make complete > sense at all. I take it Nathan is volunteering to parse the delta into logical pieces and identify what upstream is willing to accept, right? Dunno about SuSE, but as a Fedora packager I would prefer if we (Ceph) talked upstream into making regular releases and then for us to stop carrying it entirely. One less git submodule if nothing else. -- Pete -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
