On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 15:38 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dunno about SuSE, but as a Fedora packager I would prefer if we (Ceph) > > talked upstream into making regular releases and then for us to stop > > carrying it entirely. One less git submodule if nothing else. > > I would heartily support the effort to get civetweb into the distros, > too, and make this a proper package with a shared library that RGW can > link against. This can be done in parallel to the "reconciling the > code content with civetweb upstream" effort of course :) >From a "devops" perspective with local CI infra, this (proper package with shared libs) is a preferred packaging model. /M -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
