Re: verifying rpm packages for v0.80.11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



And https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5394

On 02/09/2015 07:47, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
> 
> In order to verify that the ceph.spec.in change do not introduce a regression in v0.80.11, I scheduled an upgrade/firefly suite on CentOS 6 ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#upgrade) and a ceph-deploy suite on all supported distributions (because we did not do it before http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#ceph-deploy). 
> 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5217
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5224
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5225
> 
> Cheers
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux