Hi, Thanks for sharing, it helps :-) Cheers On 21/08/2015 08:09, Zhou, Yuan wrote: > Hi Loic/Li, > > We have a local Ceph binary repo for our local teuthology testing. I'm using some modified Ceph gitbuilder (https://github.com/ceph/gitbuilder) to create the repo. The things I've changed are: > > 1. modify branch-local to watch our branchs only, otherwise there'll be too many branches to build > 2. modify make-debs.sh to add *test-dbg packages (https://gist.github.com/zhouyuan/f4c1c671c1659ece04e1) > 2. modify autobuilder.sh to make a proper directory and move the binaries there (https://gist.github.com/zhouyuan/2a2c4d1b20ff42efc351) > > It's still very simple (e,g, only Ubuntu Trusty included) but enough for our tests now. Hope this can help. > > Thanks, -yuan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Loic Dachary > Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 6:24 PM > To: Li Wang > Cc: Ceph Development > Subject: Re: testing the teuthology OpenStack backend > > Hi, > > [cc'ing the ceph-devel list for Zack or Andrew's input] > > On 19/08/2015 11:32, Li Wang wrote: >> Hi Loic, >> we did a test, the results are attached. We found that the network >> may be the bottleneck, it seems it will fetch all the packages from >> ceph website on the fly, that does take time and cause many failed >> jobs, and there are also many dead jobs, what do those mean? Do you >> have some suggestions, if possible to enable it fetch the packages >> from configurable mirror or even private package repositories? > > You can ssh to the teuthology instance (the host that runs pulpito) and modify the ~/.teuthology.yaml with > > gitbuilder_host: gitbuilder.ubuntukylin.com > > which will override the default of > > gitbuilder_host: gitbuilder.ceph.com > > I've never done that however and maybe Zack or Andrew have advices on how to establish a mirror properly. > > I think having a private package repository that is useable by teuthology is complicated because the package locations, naming conventions and build methods are difficult to reproduce (and I don't fully understand what they are right now). > > Cheers > >> >> Cheers, >> Li Wang >> >> On 2015/8/8 23:23, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 08/08/2015 16:22, Li Wang wrote: >>>> Hi Loic, >>>> Glad to talk with you on IRC about setting up the teuthology >>>> OpenStack backend. Once it is ready to run the test in private >>>> cloud, and the results could be exported and uploaded to a public >>>> place, please let me know asap :) >>> >>> I'm working on it, should be ready RSN. >>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Li Wang >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2015/8/6 23:05, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'm looking into testing the OpenStack backend for teuthology on a new cluster to verify it's portable. I think it is but ... ;-) I'm told you have an OpenStack cluster and would be interested in running teuthology workloads on it. Does it have a public facing API ? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > > N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+���z�]z���{ay� ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z� �w��� ���j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!tml= > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
