Hi, Could you please publish the benchmark results somewhere ? I should be able to figure out why you don't see a difference. Cheers On 06/08/2015 13:25, Derek Su wrote: > Dear Mr. Dachary and all, > > Recently, I found your blog show the performance tests of erasure > pools (http://dachary.org/?p=3042 , http://dachary.org/?p=3665). > The results indicates the write throughput can be enhanced > significantly using Intel xeon CPU. > > I tried to create an erasure pool with isa plugin, reed_sol_van > technique, and k/m=4/2 on the Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 v3 @ > 3.40GHz machines. > > However, the results of the rados benchmark showed that there was no > any difference between the jerasure and isa plugins. It seems very > strange. > > Do I need to do other configurations in addition to only setting the > erasure profile? > In addition, how can I know the erasure pool is accelerated by ISA > plugin exactly? Is there any command I can use? > > Thanks, :) > > Derek Su. > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
