About the Ceph erasure pool with ISA plugin on Intel xeon CPU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Mr. Dachary and all,

Recently, I found your blog show the performance tests of erasure
pools (http://dachary.org/?p=3042 , http://dachary.org/?p=3665).
The results indicates the write throughput can be enhanced
significantly using Intel xeon CPU.

I tried to create an erasure pool with isa plugin, reed_sol_van
technique, and k/m=4/2 on the Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 v3 @
3.40GHz machines.

However, the results of the rados benchmark showed that there was no
any difference between the jerasure and isa plugins. It seems very
strange.

Do I need to do other configurations in addition to only setting the
erasure profile?
In addition, how can I know the erasure pool is accelerated by ISA
plugin exactly? Is there any command I can use?

Thanks, :)

Derek Su.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux