We have a PR https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/414 that addressed part of this issue, e.g. added hammer-x to the mix (it's ready to be merged). We also have two tickets where requirements for this suite were captured: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11413 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11414 Per Josh's comment "Also I think we'll want to start doing mixed-client-version tests, particularly for things like rbd's exclusive locking", I assigned #11414 for next steps. Question/request to the team leads - pls either agree with a need to add specific tests for mixed clients testing (and pls add tickets as you feel necessary.) or suggest otherwise. I am guessing: rbd - confirmed by Josh, we need those rados - Sam, Sage? cephfs - Greg? rgw - Yehuda? I am sure I missing lots of others... What do you think? Thx YuriW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Durgin" <jdurgin@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "Sage Weil" <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx>, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 1:59:11 PM Subject: Re: client/cluster compatibility testing On 04/16/2015 09:42 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > I think the simplest way to address this is to talk about compatibility in > terms of the upstream stable releases (firefly, hammer, etc.), and test > that compatibility with teuthology tests from ceph-qa-suite.git. We have > some basic inter-version client/cluster tests already in > suites/upgrade/client-upgrade. Currently these test new (version "x") > clients against a given release (dumpling, firefly). I think we just need > to add hammer to that mix, and then add a second set of tests that do the > reverse: test clients from a given release (dumpling, firefly, hammer) > against an arbitrary cluster version ("x"). The suites in suites/upgrade/$version-x do this, and use a mixed version cluster rather than a purely version x cluster. It seems like people would want that intra-cluster version coverage for smooth upgrades. Just need to add hammer-x there too (Yuri's renaming the client ones to be $version-client-x for less confusion). Also I think we'll want to start doing mixed-client-version tests, particularly for things like rbd's exclusive locking: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11405 Josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
