Re: 'Immutable bit' on pools to prevent deletion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wido den Hollander wrote:

<snip>
> Is it a sane thing to look at 'features' which pools could have? Other
> features which might be set on a pool:
> 
> - Read Only (all write operations return -EPERM)
> - Delete Protected

There's another pool feature I'd find very useful: a WORM flag, that permits 
only create & append (at the RADOS level, not the RBD level as was an 
Emperor blueprint).

In particular, I'd _love_ being able to make something that takes Postgres 
WAL logs and puts them in such a pool, providing real guarantees re: 
consistency. Similarly, audit logs and such for compliance.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux