On 01/17/2015 03:31 AM, Alex Elsayed wrote: > Wido den Hollander wrote: > > <snip> >> Is it a sane thing to look at 'features' which pools could have? Other >> features which might be set on a pool: >> >> - Read Only (all write operations return -EPERM) >> - Delete Protected > > There's another pool feature I'd find very useful: a WORM flag, that permits > only create & append (at the RADOS level, not the RBD level as was an > Emperor blueprint). > Yes, that seems like a good addition. If we introduce the system of 'flags' for pools such a flag could be implemented as well. > In particular, I'd _love_ being able to make something that takes Postgres > WAL logs and puts them in such a pool, providing real guarantees re: > consistency. Similarly, audit logs and such for compliance. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Wido den Hollander 42on B.V. Ceph trainer and consultant Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902 Skype: contact42on -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
