On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 11/03/2014 03:20 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Wido den Hollander wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> While look at init-ceph and ceph-disk I noticed a discrepancy between them. > >> > >> init-ceph mounts XFS filesystems with rw,noatime,inode64, but > >> ceph-disk(-active) with rw,noatime > >> > >> As inode64 gives the best performance, shouldn't ceph-disk do the same? > > > > I noticed this a while back but didn't finish fixing it.. can you take a > > look at wip-xfs-inode64 and see if it looks right? > > > > Looks good to me. Simple fix, but that should do it. ..and I just realized this is already merged into giant. Pushed a backport to the firefly branch. Thanks! sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
