On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > While look at init-ceph and ceph-disk I noticed a discrepancy between them. > > init-ceph mounts XFS filesystems with rw,noatime,inode64, but > ceph-disk(-active) with rw,noatime > > As inode64 gives the best performance, shouldn't ceph-disk do the same? I noticed this a while back but didn't finish fixing it.. can you take a look at wip-xfs-inode64 and see if it looks right? > Any implications if we add inode64 on running deployments? I don't think so! Note that on new kernels I think inode64 is now the default, so this is really about performance on older systems (precise, rhel6, probably). sage > > -- > Wido den Hollander > 42on B.V. > Ceph trainer and consultant > > Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902 > Skype: contact42on > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
