On 11/03/2014 03:20 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> Hi, >> >> While look at init-ceph and ceph-disk I noticed a discrepancy between them. >> >> init-ceph mounts XFS filesystems with rw,noatime,inode64, but >> ceph-disk(-active) with rw,noatime >> >> As inode64 gives the best performance, shouldn't ceph-disk do the same? > > I noticed this a while back but didn't finish fixing it.. can you take a > look at wip-xfs-inode64 and see if it looks right? > Looks good to me. Simple fix, but that should do it. >> Any implications if we add inode64 on running deployments? > > I don't think so! Note that on new kernels I think inode64 is now the > default, so this is really about performance on older systems (precise, > rhel6, probably). > Yes, I noticed that later on. But it gives consistency. Ubuntu precise and RHEL 6 will be around for quite some time, so it would be better to enable it for those systems as well. Wido > sage > >> >> -- >> Wido den Hollander >> 42on B.V. >> Ceph trainer and consultant >> >> Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902 >> Skype: contact42on >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Wido den Hollander 42on B.V. Ceph trainer and consultant Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902 Skype: contact42on -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
