On Dec 12, 2012, at 2:17 PM, James Page wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 12/12/12 15:44, Sage Weil wrote: >>>> Gah - this will bite when I do the next upload to Ubuntu as >>>> well then; Can I suggest that we rework debian/rules for >>>> debhelper >= 7 and use overrides rather than the current 'old >>>> style' rules which define all tasks? I was toying with doing >>>> this anyway (and have it working locally) - it does cut out >>>> some of the content from d/rules and makes it a bit more >>>> *magic* >>>> >>>> Thoughts? I'm happy to raise a pull request for this. >> Yes, please! In the meantime, does build-indep sound like a valid >> workaround? (This hiccup has been delaying some simple fixes in >> 0.55.1, but unless there is a quick fix I think we'll just release >> it without the java bindings for now to get those fixes out to >> people.) > > Try this - > https://github.com/javacruft/ceph/commit/eb9516b92fbf1d09376ad86bc081d927f47656c0 > > I've given it a quick sniff locally to check the package build process > generates the arch:all packages when requested (and does not when a > architecture specific build is requested). > Hi James - I took your new rules file out for a spin. It built ok, but we still got the libcephfs-java_0.55.1-1precise_all.deb built despite the --binary-arch flag. The command used for the build is: sudo pbuilder build --binary-arch --debug --distribution precise --basetgz /srv/debian-base/precise.tgz --buildresult /tmp/release/0.55.1/ --debbuildopts '-j8 -b' /tmp/release/0.55.1/ceph_0.55.1-1precise.dsc And the log shows the -B option on dpkg-buildpackage: I: Building the package I: Running cd tmp/buildd/*/ && env PATH="/usr/lib/ccache:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin" dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -B -j8 -b -rfakeroot I'm not sure what to look at next. Thanks, Gary -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
