-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/12/12 23:00, Gary Lowell wrote: > On Dec 11, 2012, at 2:06 AM, James Page wrote: > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On 11/12/12 06:32, Gary Lowell wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I assume you are building with "dpkg-buildpackage" >>>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The manpage shows: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "-B Specifies a binary-only build, limited to >>>>>>>>> architecture dependent packages. Passed to >>>>>>>>> dpkg-genchanges." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "-A Specifies a binary-only build, limited to >>>>>>>>> architecture independent packages. Passed to >>>>>>>>> dpkg-genchanges." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So on the i386 and amd64 machines you'd run with -B >>>>>>>>> and sync them to ceph.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On one of the machines you'd also run with -A which >>>>>>>>> should produce the architecture independent >>>>>>>>> packages like libcephfs-java. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's the theory, I haven't tested it :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Wido >>>>> Thanks Wido. We're using pbuilder, but it looks like it >>>>> has similar options, or can pass an option string to >>>>> dpkg_buildpackage. I'll do some testing. >>> >>> "--binary-arch" will limit a pbuilder build to the target >>> binary architecture only; I would recommend you use this with >>> the amd64 build and build the arch: all packages out of the >>> i386 build; this is what happens in the official Ubuntu >>> builders. >>> > Hi James, > > I thought this was going to be the easy solution, but on running a > quick test, we are already calling pbuilder with the --binary-arch > option and it its building the java package anyway. It looks > like there is a deeper issue in that we building the java package > in the default target. It looks like for this to work, we need to > move the java library build to it's own target in the Makefile, and > build that target from the binary-indep target in the debian rules > file. Does this sound like I'm on the right track ? Gah - this will bite when I do the next upload to Ubuntu as well then; Can I suggest that we rework debian/rules for debhelper >= 7 and use overrides rather than the current 'old style' rules which define all tasks? I was toying with doing this anyway (and have it working locally) - it does cut out some of the content from d/rules and makes it a bit more *magic* Thoughts? I'm happy to raise a pull request for this. - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.page@xxxxxxxxxx -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQyGSnAAoJEL/srsug59jDkCUP/jq71IWWEnh8kMNhJgIBkjay x6NLdTgmaLySC2MUgMFoa4XPwPF2YmtH2oLf8dNDvHPB7yijeOblhjIzjmCAg7Ui EHE6IKS5IaDGTfyOnskdjUESZkH7BlqLul+vx7hHm2ucEiJcUcv4Zey0RpgHApTq UqSKJUBG7z54y9Lf5cPGCnr4ox2d3I5+RKLCLrwSpht8VPC3R3yCFzOe2ZSKCKna NQ5PeNbSgiwsdI+DmcgPdc7ztbJ6DA8MGHL2CPUr50xDDh/rC7uU2ag9qq7TEYh3 AQf5UoauJtmGxtG//U0RgNG7LEwSXn87qeY5bGaOVXiQ4gVKzaZLKW1M3CU97g/R TXwm3jLaNn0hF3x/lbJcGhT0yggrsgOCHjO23PYLarOzg0I81FcubZydujJDbHUK 52dD+Hb4OHyNQCxg0YUsI5PzASPoiRzbMny1cGEEgR+ypdy+Phezfc2aaYx29x0P RqKyw36T8kuDjLWaQVoiQPi3A05K/AX3G0Mn4zCBqPMKQnzYhSj7uezh6fzY6uxd oh8q7yCgSBI/5LzvjIssqUZ3bXG7fSZYO5Yz8+7lNHkb0gIhDMH1HTKnHlvxW/Tg YyaXX1o1TFdc/SNDulqRYaDe2juzud7oTmiH30/FcFHUfqkTnnFTzv7OL8n+07YN RPhPOAE7CeWHDkbJl4D4 =f4FX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
