Re: What would a good OSD node hardware configuration look like?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 07-11-12 09:17, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
2012/11/7 Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxxx>:
Except that SSDs will mainly fail due to the amount of write cycles they had
to endure.

So in RAID-1 your SSDs will fail at almost the same time.

With for example 8 OSDs in a server you better spread them out 50/50 over
two SSDs.

But the OS should be installed on SSD, to allow the use of the whole
SATA/SAS disk as OSDs.
Without RAID-1 between SSDs, a disk failure will result it the whole node down.
--

True. You might want to use a small internal USB stick like those from Transcend for installing your OS. They are available in 4GB and 8GB.

Let syslog handle your logging to an external device and you have almost no write I/O on that thing.

This way you can use the SSDs completely for journaling and shrink them using HPA with hdparm.

Still, I think that in the distributed nature it shouldn't matter if you loose a node. If loosing a node is a to big impact to your cluster, go with smaller nodes.

Wido

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux