Re: Ceph journal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/10/31 Stefan Kleijkers <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> As far as I know, this is correct. You get a ACK (on the write) back after
> it landed on ALL three journals (or/and osds in case of BTRFS in parallel
> mode). So If you lose one node, you still have it in two more nodes and they
> will commit it to disk. After recovering the missing node/osd it will get
> the data from one of the other nodes. So you won't lose any data.

In this case I can suppose that ceph writing speed is relative to the
journal's writing speed and never to ODS disks.

Let's assume a journal size of 150GB, capable to write at 200MB/s in a
2gbit/s network (lacp between two gigabit ports), no replica between
OSDs and very very slow SATA disk (5400 RPM, for example, much slower
than jurnal). Just a single osd.
Ceph will write at 200MB/s, and in background it will flush journals
to disk, right?

I can assume that journal is a buffer and RBD will write only to it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux