Re: How will Ceph cope with a failed Journal device?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 18 May 2012, Tommi Virtanen wrote:

Losing a journal with btrfs: creating a new journal should let the osd
recover the missing parts from replicas (and your data is safe mostly
because of Ceph replication, recovery is just faster).

Cool! No more SSDs (that might fail over being written to continuously after a couple of months depending in size, prize, write cycles etc) just add a lot of RAM, keep the journals on tmpfs and make sure to run Ceph on Btrfs? While keeping the replicas separated so not all fail at once.

The contents of the storage node will not be corrupt or something (just a bit old) when losing the journal?

--jerker
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux